Tag Archives: Lord Bramall

Nov 17 2019 – Peter Hitchens on Lord Bramall and Bishop Bell…and Archbishop Welby


Peter Hitchens

Peter Hitchens

Welby still won’t do the right thing

Peter Hitchens – Mail on Sunday – November 17 2019

It is a shocking thing to say, but it is true that it is fortunate for the late Field Marshal Lord Bramall, who died last week, that he was falsely accused while he was still alive. Had the attack happened years after his death, as was the case with the comparably great Bishop George Bell of Chichester, the law would not in the end have rescued his reputation.

You can say what you like about the dead, and nothing will happen to you. The accusations of terrible sex crimes made decades after his death against Bishop Bell have been comprehensively shown to be mistaken, to put it charitably.

But some people, most notable among them the Archbishop of Canterbury himself, Justin Welby, continue to refuse to admit they were mistaken when they first accepted them.

He claims sulkily that there’s still a ‘significant cloud’ over Bishop Bell. By behaving in this way, Mr Welby shows he does not properly understand the faith of the church he heads.



Revd Peter Mullen

Good for Peter Hitchens!
Welby and his sidekick, the extremely unpleasant, waxy and oleaginous Bishop Martin Warner of Chichester, have been called to account many times over the last few years and asked politely to do the right thing and apologise. No result.
My opinions don’t count for very much in the world of ecclesiastical skulduggery, but I have published a few articles about this scandal.
Is there anything else to be done?
~ Rev Peter Mullen

Daily Telegraph – “Justice for bishop” – Letters – October 15 2016 – Dr Ruth Hildebrandt Grayson [+ January 5 2016 Letters]

The Telegraph
 OCTOBER 15 2016
 Dr George Kennedy Allen Bell (1883 - 1958), Bishop of Chichester, in his study at Chichester Palace
George Bell in his study at Chicester Palace CREDIT: GETTY IMAGES 

SIR – Lord Bramall notes, rightly, that the authorities should not “cast aside the basic principles of justice itself” when investigating cases of child abuse.

Next Wednesday, a group of individuals concerned with obtaining justice in the case of the late George Bell, former bishop of Chichester, will hand in a petition with over 2,000 signatures at Lambeth Palace.

It is a year since the Church of England published the outcome of a covert inquiry into a single case of alleged child abuse by the bishop in the late Forties or early Fifties. No effort was made to assemble, or to request that those in a position to do so might assemble, a case for the defence. Moreover, the Church has refused numerous requests to disclose the nature of the sources it used to reach its decision.

The petition requests that the case should be reopened. In light of the fact that a strong case for the late bishop’s defence has now been assembled by a number of people with close connections to him, there is no excuse for the Church to delay a fresh investigation any further.

Dr Ruth Hildebrandt Grayson
Sheffield, South Yorkshire


Bishop Bell declared guilty without trial

Dr George Bell, the former Bishop of Chichester

SIR – As the daughter of Franz Hildebrandt, a close friend of Bishop George Bell, who made him and so many other refugees welcome in this country, I am deeply saddened by the recent accusations against the bishop.

However, like Charles Moore, I am even more saddened by the Church’s apparent willingness to ignore the basic principle of British justice: that a person is innocent until proved guilty. It would appear that the primary motivation in the Church’s decision to compensate the alleged victim and disgrace Bishop Bell was fear of public outcry had it not done so.

Even if there were sufficient evidence to warrant Bishop Bell’s arrest had he been alive, which has certainly not been demonstrated to date, this is a far cry from saying he would have been charged or found guilty.

As Mr Moore notes, there have been many cases of alleged abuse in which people have been unfairly treated by the authorities and the media, and later shown to be innocent.

The term “witch hunt” has already been used with regard to the recent treatment of Bishop Bell. It is ironic that the Church could be seen to be a party to such a process – which ceased in this country in the literal sense several centuries ago.

I challenge the Church authorities to make public the evidence on which their actions have been based, and to give us the opportunity of examining the facts for ourselves.

Dr Ruth Hildebrandt Grayson
Sheffield, South Yorkshire

SIR – Charles Moore identifies the bewilderment and anguish that exist in the diocese of Chichester, and well beyond it, following the announcement of an allegation against Bishop George Bell and the settlement of a civil claim.

This goes deep. It has inevitably been linked with the trial and conviction of other clergy from the diocese of Chichester who have been convicted of sexual abuse, among them Peter Ball, a former bishop of Lewes.

However, the impact of an accusation against a person of Bishop Bell’s stature is far more profound. We have not lost sight of that. The suggestion that we would trade the reputation of Bishop Bell for a moment of political, social or even media advantage is seriously mistaken.

The perspective that receives little acknowledgement in Mr Moore’s article is that of a survivor. Within Britain, and certainly within the Church of England, we are seeking to move on from a culture in which manipulation of power meant that victims were too afraid to make allegations, or allegations were easily dismissed.

In future we must provide safeguards of truth and justice for all, victim and accused alike.

It is for that reason that I welcome the Goddard Inquiry as a more balanced forum than the media might be for a judicial and forensic assessment of our handling of child-abuse cases. If, in the matter of Bishop Bell, or any other case, we in the diocese of Chichester are shown to have acted without proper attention to our responsibilities as guardians of the Christian faith, the vulnerable and the voiceless, then I would expect public censure and its consequences to follow.

Rt Rev Martin Warner
Bishop of Chichester
Chichester, West Sussex